Popular events such as Olympics or world cup can be helpful in easing international tensions by promoting healthy competition, but it may still be influenced by the present relation between countries. Popular sports events such as cricket world cup in Pakistan promotes healthy activity not just forRead more
Popular events such as Olympics or world cup can be helpful in easing international tensions by promoting healthy competition, but it may still be influenced by the present relation between countries.
Popular sports events such as cricket world cup in Pakistan promotes healthy activity not just for the participants, but also for the citizens of the country. The time period during which cricket world cup is played the minds of the people are diverted towards watching cricket matches and a smaller number of people participates in riots and other patriotic gatherings. In Pakistan, it is also very common to see children and young people playing cricket in grounds and streets during the world cup. So, it not only diverts people from untoward activities, but also provides healthy activity.
Nonetheless, international tensions can adversely impact the sports event as well. Talking about the cricket matches between Pakistan and India more aggression is visible not only among players but also among spectators. For instance, it is common to see arguments and exchange of harsh words between players during matches. Moreover, viewers are also seen throwing things towards players in the fields, including soft drink bottles. Hence, popular events including cricket world cup is not an effective measure to ease the international tensions that exist, and it can also exaggerate the problems if occurred during those matches
Thus, I believe popular events can divert people from patriotic emotions, but diverting players from international tensions is difficult and requires proper training.
The table below shows the percentage of consumer durables owned in Britain from 1972 to 1983. The highest number of consumer durable that was owned by British people is television set at 98% in 1983. Whereas, the lowest number of ownerships was recorded in terms of dishwasher at 3% in both 1978 andRead more
The table below shows the percentage of consumer durables owned in Britain from 1972 to 1983.
The highest number of consumer durable that was owned by British people is television set at 98% in 1983. Whereas, the lowest number of ownerships was recorded in terms of dishwasher at 3% in both 1978 and 1979. Though no consumer durable experience a decline in ownership, the greatest increase was noted in telephone from 42% in 1972 to 77% in 1983. The most famous consumer durable turned out to be a television which was owned by 93% in 1972 and rose to 98% in 1983.
It is interesting to note that, the ownership of video started from 18% in 1983; whereas ownership of dishwasher started from 3% in 1978 to 5% in 1983. Moreover, the ownership of vacuum cleaner surged from 87% in 1972 to 95% in 1982, before plummeting to zero in 1983.
The charts shows the details related to purpose and destination of visit by UK residents from 1994 to 1998. In 1998, 20700 UK residents travelled for holiday purpose which was the highest number recorded; whereas, only 896 travelled in 1995 for other reasons, which was the lowest number. The highestRead more
The charts shows the details related to purpose and destination of visit by UK residents from 1994 to 1998.
In 1998, 20700 UK residents travelled for holiday purpose which was the highest number recorded; whereas, only 896 travelled in 1995 for other reasons, which was the lowest number. The highest increase was also noted in holiday travel which rose from 15246 in 1994 to 20700 in 1998. Except business travelers, 1995 experience a decline in travelers as compared to 1994, contributed by holiday, visit to friends and other reasons categories.
Although the lowest number which is 914 travelled to north region in 1995, UK residents travelling to western region recorded the highest number in 1998 at 24519. The largest percentage increase was recorded in UK residents travelling to north region which surged from 919 in 1994 to 1823 in 1998. Nonetheless, total visitors fall in 1995 in contrast to 1994, the category of north region only experienced a reduction of 5 travelers.
I disagree that capital punishment is essential to control violence in society. Capital punishment does not make our lives secure because the accused is not exact culprit most of the time, and no one has right to take the life of others. In most cases, target killing is done by mercenary who do thisRead more
I disagree that capital punishment is essential to control violence in society. Capital punishment does not make our lives secure because the accused is not exact culprit most of the time, and no one has right to take the life of others.
In most cases, target killing is done by mercenary who do this just for the sake of money so accused is not the exact culprit because the main culprit is mostly rich and is a person of great influence. For example, some rich businessmen or politicians hire mercenaries for criminal activities. This does not deter the real culprit to stop doing such violent activities, for they could hire another person by offering money. Thus, capital punishment does not decrease crime because the main culprit goes unpunished most of the time.
Secondly, I believe no one has right to deprive someone from the life. Even though it is the responsibility of law enforcement agencies to maintain law and order, it does not acquit them for giving death sentence to anyone. Rather, the criminals must be diverted towards community service work which actually changes their mindset and make them good citizen. For example, the prisoners could be allocated task to serve other prisoners.
Therefore, I believe capital punishment does not make our lives secure or reduce crimes of violence. In order to reduce violence in society capital punishment must be replaced with community work in order to change the mindset of criminals.
Popular events like the football world cup and other international sporting occasions are essential in easing international tensions and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion.
Popular events such as Olympics or world cup can be helpful in easing international tensions by promoting healthy competition, but it may still be influenced by the present relation between countries. Popular sports events such as cricket world cup in Pakistan promotes healthy activity not just forRead more
Popular events such as Olympics or world cup can be helpful in easing international tensions by promoting healthy competition, but it may still be influenced by the present relation between countries.
Popular sports events such as cricket world cup in Pakistan promotes healthy activity not just for the participants, but also for the citizens of the country. The time period during which cricket world cup is played the minds of the people are diverted towards watching cricket matches and a smaller number of people participates in riots and other patriotic gatherings. In Pakistan, it is also very common to see children and young people playing cricket in grounds and streets during the world cup. So, it not only diverts people from untoward activities, but also provides healthy activity.
Nonetheless, international tensions can adversely impact the sports event as well. Talking about the cricket matches between Pakistan and India more aggression is visible not only among players but also among spectators. For instance, it is common to see arguments and exchange of harsh words between players during matches. Moreover, viewers are also seen throwing things towards players in the fields, including soft drink bottles. Hence, popular events including cricket world cup is not an effective measure to ease the international tensions that exist, and it can also exaggerate the problems if occurred during those matches
Thus, I believe popular events can divert people from patriotic emotions, but diverting players from international tensions is difficult and requires proper training.
See lessThe table below shows the consumer durables (telephone, refrigerator, etc.) owned in Britain from 1972 to 1983. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.
The table below shows the percentage of consumer durables owned in Britain from 1972 to 1983. The highest number of consumer durable that was owned by British people is television set at 98% in 1983. Whereas, the lowest number of ownerships was recorded in terms of dishwasher at 3% in both 1978 andRead more
The table below shows the percentage of consumer durables owned in Britain from 1972 to 1983.
The highest number of consumer durable that was owned by British people is television set at 98% in 1983. Whereas, the lowest number of ownerships was recorded in terms of dishwasher at 3% in both 1978 and 1979. Though no consumer durable experience a decline in ownership, the greatest increase was noted in telephone from 42% in 1972 to 77% in 1983. The most famous consumer durable turned out to be a television which was owned by 93% in 1972 and rose to 98% in 1983.
It is interesting to note that, the ownership of video started from 18% in 1983; whereas ownership of dishwasher started from 3% in 1978 to 5% in 1983. Moreover, the ownership of vacuum cleaner surged from 87% in 1972 to 95% in 1982, before plummeting to zero in 1983.
See lessThe first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross-section of 100,000 people asking if they travelled abroad and why they travelled for the period 1994-98. The second chart shows their destinations over the same period. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.
The charts shows the details related to purpose and destination of visit by UK residents from 1994 to 1998. In 1998, 20700 UK residents travelled for holiday purpose which was the highest number recorded; whereas, only 896 travelled in 1995 for other reasons, which was the lowest number. The highestRead more
The charts shows the details related to purpose and destination of visit by UK residents from 1994 to 1998.
See lessIn 1998, 20700 UK residents travelled for holiday purpose which was the highest number recorded; whereas, only 896 travelled in 1995 for other reasons, which was the lowest number. The highest increase was also noted in holiday travel which rose from 15246 in 1994 to 20700 in 1998. Except business travelers, 1995 experience a decline in travelers as compared to 1994, contributed by holiday, visit to friends and other reasons categories.
Although the lowest number which is 914 travelled to north region in 1995, UK residents travelling to western region recorded the highest number in 1998 at 24519. The largest percentage increase was recorded in UK residents travelling to north region which surged from 919 in 1994 to 1823 in 1998. Nonetheless, total visitors fall in 1995 in contrast to 1994, the category of north region only experienced a reduction of 5 travelers.
Without capital punishment (the death penalty) our lives are less secure and crimes of violence increase. Capital punishment in essential to control violence in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
I disagree that capital punishment is essential to control violence in society. Capital punishment does not make our lives secure because the accused is not exact culprit most of the time, and no one has right to take the life of others. In most cases, target killing is done by mercenary who do thisRead more
I disagree that capital punishment is essential to control violence in society. Capital punishment does not make our lives secure because the accused is not exact culprit most of the time, and no one has right to take the life of others.
See lessIn most cases, target killing is done by mercenary who do this just for the sake of money so accused is not the exact culprit because the main culprit is mostly rich and is a person of great influence. For example, some rich businessmen or politicians hire mercenaries for criminal activities. This does not deter the real culprit to stop doing such violent activities, for they could hire another person by offering money. Thus, capital punishment does not decrease crime because the main culprit goes unpunished most of the time.
Secondly, I believe no one has right to deprive someone from the life. Even though it is the responsibility of law enforcement agencies to maintain law and order, it does not acquit them for giving death sentence to anyone. Rather, the criminals must be diverted towards community service work which actually changes their mindset and make them good citizen. For example, the prisoners could be allocated task to serve other prisoners.
Therefore, I believe capital punishment does not make our lives secure or reduce crimes of violence. In order to reduce violence in society capital punishment must be replaced with community work in order to change the mindset of criminals.