Examination is part of educational system from quite a time. Opponents of the approach, consider it is as the best source of accessing person’s caliber and skill and they have arguments in its favour. While the proponents of this approach consider it as more of a mind test rather than absolute representation. I would broach upon both views in subsequent paragraphs.
On the one hand, people are of the opinion that exams are true way to judge an individual skills. As they believe it to be the most practiced traditional way to evaluate. As exam takers has to solve the the test under quantified time. Which some time induces state of pressure and anxiety. People believe that this approach strengthens the time management and stress bearing skills. Which can be helpful in individual’s both professional and personal life. Though, there are certain subjects in which only exams are the real best way to judge an individual performance. For instance a person studying language course, can be better evaluated on grammar, vocabulary and spellings in written form in contrast to using any other alternative assessment techniques.
Proponents of this approach believe that exams are not the true way to judge a student upon. They believe it to be a mind game and test of how well can a person remember and recall. Also how lucky he may gets, during exams. Considering the former stated reasons they take it as a crude and ineffective evaluation methodology. As they are the firm believers of opinion that stress hampers the productivity and performance, they believe on other non conventional methodologies like projects, presentations, debates as more effective ways. Many universities have already adopted the radical approach and use them in various fields like in computer science a major part of a semester criteria depends upon projects, discussions, analysis, researches and a very little percentage constitutes of old exam pattern.
It can be summed as, there are people with both set of opinions over exams being true representation and each have their own perspectives and arguments of their support, but with changing trends it seem like that the trends would be shifted to non conventional evaluation patterns.
Tag: writing-task-2 both-views
-
Exams can never be a true repersentation of our skills. Discuss both point of views.
-
assigning homeowrk to children should be discourged as it reduces productivity.
Home assignments are considered to be primitive ways of learning and increasing productivity, proponents of this notion have myriad reasons for this agreement. On the contrary, some people argue upon giving assignments as they believe it hampers the productivity. I would broach upon both the sides in following paragraphs.
One compelling argument in the favour of the statement is for being a primitive and widely practiced and testified methodology. As they consider it as a source of revision, for what students have learned at school. They consider the home based tasks as a way to reinforce and recall every detail they have studied. As they take it as a way of practice. Such people are of the opinion that by adopting this strategy the individuals can be made more focused and study oriented.
Proponents of this view, disagree with this notion and according to them home based assignments do a little good on and majorly it hinders one’s performance and productivity. Their concepts are based on the basis of letting the schools be a studying place and home to be a relaxing place, rather than making family time more of a study time. They believe in letting the students enjoy their time and have a work life balance. They are of the opinion that children should be allowed and not persuaded to relive the school routine in their leisure time. They should be allowed to play with friends, have family time. They believe that over emphasising and imposing studies onto them will induce pressure and stress.
It can be summed up, both the approaches and their followers have their own arguments and reasons. Some people that it elevates the productivity, while others are of the opinion that this approach induces more stress and hampers individual strengths and performance. -
In some countries children have strict rules of behaviour, in other countries they are allowed to do almost anything them want. To what extent should children have to follow rules.
Behaviours play an important role in any individual’s life. In some countries children are often forced to follow strict rules, on the other hand some people believe on letting the children be as free birds. Both the stated approaches have their own advantages and disadvantages.
It is commonly believed, that there should be strict set of rules for children as it will highly enhance them to be more productive, disciplined and mannered. As with strict rules many individuals tend to be more focused and determined. Apart from their personality traits, children who are brought up in strict culture are less exposed to outer world thus their minds cannot be persuaded in wrong directions.
A recent study has shown that the people who are brought up under firm behavioural rules are likely to excel more in their personal and professional life.On the contrary, some people believe in letting the children be their own decision makers. Giving them the space to make their own choices. Individuals belonging to this school of thought are likely to be more creative and decisive. As them are them self responsible for their decisions and in turn they face many experiences, which in result help them to learn more. Such people are more likely to be the ones who are open minded and do not limitize themselves with rules and regulations.
To conclude, there are people with both thinking methodologies, their end goal is to teach their children with best possible ways they can to approach the life outcomes. Some believe in adopting a firm approach by imposing the rules onto them, while others believe in letting the individuals be their own decision makers.